Inquiring about applicants’ vehicle ownership status could potentially be discriminatory.

Challenges with Employee Attendance Due to Car Troubles: Navigating the Legal Implications in Job Interviews

As an employer, it can be frustrating when employees are unable to come to work due to car troubles. This can lead to disruptions in productivity and cause strain on the rest of the team. In an effort to ensure consistent attendance, some employers may consider asking job applicants whether they own a working vehicle during the interview process. However, this seemingly innocent question can have legal implications and should be approached with caution.

Discrimination Concerns

In general, it is not appropriate to ask an applicant whether they own a working vehicle. This is because such a question may be considered discriminatory, unless driving a personal vehicle for work is an essential duty of the position for which the applicant is applying. The law prohibits employers from using an applicant’s financial information in ways that could create a disparate impact on the applicant.

“Disparate impact” refers to a situation where an employment practice appears neutral but disproportionately affects members of a protected class, such as race, gender, or physical disability. For example, requiring physical tests for positions where such physical strength is not a requirement could disproportionately affect women or individuals with disabilities, constituting a disparate impact if the requirement is not justified by the job’s nature.

In the case of asking about vehicle ownership, this requirement could create a disparate impact on applicants from racial minorities who may have lower socioeconomic backgrounds and less access to personal transportation due to systemic barriers. It could also adversely affect applicants with physical disabilities who may be unable to drive due to their impairments.

Job Relevance

According to guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), financial requirements for a job, such as vehicle ownership or access to a working vehicle, must be directly relevant to the job’s specific duties. This is particularly important when evaluating an applicant’s reliability and responsibility. If driving is not an essential job duty, then asking about vehicle ownership or access should not be part of the interview process and should not influence the hiring decision.

Therefore, it is crucial for employers to carefully assess the relevance of vehicle ownership or access in relation to the job duties for the position. This will help determine the appropriateness of asking vehicle-related questions to applicants.

Framing Interview Questions

While an applicant’s ability to show up on time to work is undoubtedly a job-related concern, the way they commute does not automatically determine their punctuality. Therefore, employers should ask questions that are meant to obtain information about an applicant’s reliability and responsibility, rather than their mode of transportation.

For example, instead of asking whether an applicant owns a working vehicle, employers could ask about their transportation arrangements and whether they have a reliable means of getting to work. This allows for a more inclusive approach and avoids potential discrimination concerns.

In conclusion, while it is understandable that employers want to ensure consistent attendance from their employees, it is important to be mindful of the legal implications of asking about vehicle ownership during job interviews. Employers should carefully consider the relevance of this information to the job duties and frame interview questions in a way that does not discriminate against protected classes. By doing so, employers can avoid potential legal issues and create a more inclusive hiring process. 

Share This Article
Leave a comment